A colleague of mine posted about an investigation for code programming designed for the machine to produce original research questions.
It is mind-bogglingly that the question “Why” is not understood more strongly in society, particularly among policy decision-makers. Why “models can go a step further and autonomously generate novel research ideas”?
I understand the scientific curiosity. However, we have been historically here before: scientific curiosity achieving the capacity, then placing pressure for de-humanising policy change; outcomes in impoverishing human beings with less jobs and advantages for machine thinking, and disadvantaging the human condition.
Tell me why persons have trouble thinking. Answer: de-education. This is a challenge for persons to think on the broad and deep meaning of HUMANISM.
Featured Image: Young guy writer in hat and glasses using typing machine. From multiple idea through the machine thinking to the extraordinary exclamation of the problem. ID 46731607 © Adam121 | Dreamstime.com
Neville Buch
Latest posts by Neville Buch (see all)
- How are we dying? Data from SMH - October 11, 2024
- Change from the western Anglo-American world - October 10, 2024
- The Problem of Australian Sandstones Universities - October 9, 2024