Dear friends,
The Common Sense Philosophy is not perfect but it can often lead into a pathway of better intelligence. Listen and watch the video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAqIypjk-5A
The honest conclusion for those who dedicated their lives to the widest and deeper understanding of epistemology and critical thinking is to vote Yes at the referendum. There is no contest here. At each turn of the No campaign claims, there is a clear demonstratable falsehood in the fallacy: a fallacy is a logical error, and thus unintelligible step. Thus the motivation to dismiss the larger meta-reflective Yes argument is not to want to be intelligent and to respond to some darker force.
Kind regards,
Neville.
Featured Image: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, August, 21, 2023: View of a bicycle parked in a bike rack and carrying a Vote Yes sign supporting the 2023 Australian Voice to Parliament referendum. Photo 288162710 © Steve Lovegrove | Dreamstime.com
The following two tabs change content below.
Neville Buch
Professional Historian at Professional Historians Association (Queensland) Inc.
Neville Buch (Pronounced Book) Ph.D. is a certified member of the Professional Historians Association (Queensland). Since 2010 he has operated a sole trade business in history consultancy. He was a Q ANZAC 100 Fellow 2014-2015 at the State Library of Queensland. Dr Buch was the PHA (Qld) e-Bulletin, the monthly state association’s electronic publication, and was a member of its Management Committee. He is the Managing Director of the Brisbane Southside History Network.
Latest posts by Neville Buch (see all)
- Why the Disciplines and No Apologetics? Part 2: The History and Future of Apologetics Courses in Christian colleges: The Historiographical Challenges from Marc Bloch (1886-1944) - May 9, 2024
- Have I Got What It Takes to Take a Stand Against the “Self-Righteous Political Decision-Makers”? - May 9, 2024
- Sleeping Satellite: Romanticism is not dead in our thinking…Take a Stand Against the Wickedness of the Times - May 6, 2024