A colleague of mine posted about an investigation for code programming designed for the machine to produce original research questions.
It is mind-bogglingly that the question “Why” is not understood more strongly in society, particularly among policy decision-makers. Why “models can go a step further and autonomously generate novel research ideas”?
I understand the scientific curiosity. However, we have been historically here before: scientific curiosity achieving the capacity, then placing pressure for de-humanising policy change; outcomes in impoverishing human beings with less jobs and advantages for machine thinking, and disadvantaging the human condition.
Tell me why persons have trouble thinking. Answer: de-education. This is a challenge for persons to think on the broad and deep meaning of HUMANISM.
Featured Image: Young guy writer in hat and glasses using typing machine. From multiple idea through the machine thinking to the extraordinary exclamation of the problem. ID 46731607 © Adam121 | Dreamstime.com
Neville Buch
Latest posts by Neville Buch (see all)
- Do you really care? - November 24, 2024
- Anticipation of a better locally-regionally world, globally conceived - November 22, 2024
- Free Thinker Institute (FTI) Stoa: Aligning Judgment with Virtue (HYBRID) - November 21, 2024