Dr Neville Buch

Professional Historian and History Consultancy Services Brisbane

Hanukkah

Read Time:

6–9 minutes
, ,

Dedication to the Memory of those Killed at Bondi Beach, 14 December 2025: Hanukkah, a Jewish festival, lasting eight days from the 25th day of Kislev (in December) and commemorating the rededication of the Temple in 165 BC by the Maccabees after its desecration by the Syrians. It is marked by the successive kindling of eight lights. It is time for forgiveness and all laying down all weapons of warfare, actual and intellectual.

 

 

 

 

The Reflective Ascent to Peace: Overcoming Conflict in the Age of Technics

 

 

 

  1. The Crisis of the Present: From Immediate Loss to Intellectual Warfare

The dedication to those who suffered loss at Bondi Beach on December 14, 2025, framed by the spirit of Hanukkah, confronts the immediate reality of violence and tragedy while simultaneously demanding a commitment to profound ethical and intellectual resolution. The anxiety experienced in Australia is part of the conflicted and troubled era defined by deep ideological, religious, and political divisions, which extend into micro-level dysfunctional situations. The challenge to lay down weapons—both actual and intellectual—is paramount in a world that increasingly feels subject to the relentless logic of perpetual conflict.

 

 

This perceived state of continuous contention is a signature feature of modern life, characterized by forces that normalize antagonism. Lewis Mumford described how, in the context of the Second World War, the price of utopia demanded totalitarian coercion and constant readiness for war, transforming the labour machine and the military machine into interchangeable functions. Today, this logic has spread, manifesting as a pervasive “war footing” where the breakdown of the distinction between wartime and peacetime creates individuals and governments existing in a state of near-constant heightened alertness and combativeness, leading to “twitchy nervous states”.

 

 

The essence of this conflict, particularly the philosophical struggle, is rooted in the ancient Greek concept of eris (the spirit of competition, jealousy, and quarrelsomeness), which eternally brings to bear upon mortals the threat of dispersion and ever-imminent war (stasis). The tragic irony is that in the modern era, intellectual energy—which should be dedicated to self-understanding and truth—is often channelled into political and ideological conflicts, such as the contemporary “culture wars”. The goal of Hanukkah’s light, therefore, is analogous to seeking guiding stars in a time of disorientation (disaster).

 

 

 

  1. The Necessity of Laying Down Actual Weapons: Mortality, Agency, and Prostheticity

The command to lay down actual weapons is fundamentally a recognition of human mortality and the self-destructive core of our technological essence. In classical Greek thought, the invention of technics (tekhnē) and the origin of mortality (thanatology) are inseparable from the original flaw (de-fault) of human existence, embodied by the double figure of Prometheus (foresight) and Epimetheus (afterthought).

 

 

The human being is defined as an essentially prosthetic being. Technology is defined as the “pursuit of life by means other than life”, meaning that life organizes the inorganic and organizes itself therein. This constitution means that mortals are self-destructive, as the prosthesis itself is a danger—an artifact that can destroy what gathers within effective and active being-together. The problem is that technology, as a force propelling human history, is often repressed as an object of philosophical thought; it is the unthought at the horizon of all future possibility.

 

 

The profound dilemma facing humanism is that while it champions human authorship, reason, and freedom, this agency is inherently situated in a prosthetic condition that simultaneously enables and threatens its existence. True peace—the cessation of actual violence—requires coming to terms with this inherent fragility, accepting that actual humanity is constituted by the possibility of self-destruction (the capacity for evil). When reflection is pushed to its absolute limit, the solution to ubiquitous suffering, if based purely on impartial calculation, might logically lead one to seek the annihilation of the planet to end suffering, a position that Williams implicitly rejects by asking us to choose which side we are on. The only viable course, therefore, is to cease the literal violence that results from eris and address the root cause of hostility in the social and political sphere.

 

 

 

III. The Practice of Forgiveness: Laying Down Intellectual Weapons

The spirit of Hanukkah—a time for forgiveness—calls for ending intellectual warfare. This requires overcoming the modern phenomena of the technicization of cognition, ideological purity, and the systemic production of blame and prejudice.

 

 

  1. The Cognitive Procedural Necessity of Kindness and Empathy:

The intention of forgiveness is realized through kindness, which Dr. Buch defines as a cognitive procedural necessity for sound ethical thought. This necessity is rooted in compassion (panser), defined as thinking as caring, which tends to the wounds inflicted by conflict.

  • This approach directly addresses the philosophical requirement for inclusion and mutual understanding. The intellectual capacity for sympathy (insightful understanding of others’ feelings) is ethically neutral, as the cruel person possesses it in the same form as the compassionate person, and any knowledge it yields may be turned against the self. Kindness, therefore, is the warmth that prevents insight from becoming the coldness of calculation.
  • Forgiveness, as a goal, requires actively combating wilful ignorance and sociological propaganda. The FTI curriculum explicitly champions rational-critical communication—open, reasoned dialogue free from domination—as the medium for liberation and overcoming distorted communication.

 

 

  1. Overcoming the Morality System and Blame:

Forgiveness necessitates resisting the powerful societal impulse to fixate on blame and moral obligation as the sole criteria for ethical judgment. The morality system emphasizes voluntary action and treats moral obligation as an inescapable demand that eclipses any other consideration.

  • Bernard Williams critiques this system, showing that blame is central to a special form of ethical life in our culture. Blame is narrowly focused on the particular voluntary act, trying to realize an ideal of absolutely pure justice.
  • However, blame rests on fictions and often operates as a fantasied, magical change that aims at retrospective prevention of the harmful act, rather than actual reform. It risks encouraging people to misunderstand their own fear and resentment as the “voice of the Law”.
  • Forgiveness demands moving beyond the fictional purity of blame. It requires confronting the fact that moral luck and unintended consequences (agent-regret) are indelible aspects of agency. The voluntary is an inherently superficial concept which should not be asked to do too much. Accepting this self-imposed limitation on our power allows for a richer, more complex understanding of ethical life.

 

 

  1. The Historical Imperative for Truthfulness:

Intellectual peace requires rooting one’s critique in historical truthfulness. Philosophical reflection demands truthfully examining our social and historical bearings and gaining ethical insight into institutions by understanding how they generate belief in themselves.

  • The failure to reconcile opposing forces often results in Historical Forgetfulness—when one does not ask the critical question—and leads to stagnation and a reversion to crude, dogmatic thinking. The work of German thinkers like Theodor Haecker argues that purely idealistic philosophies render history meaningless and everything historical a “completely incomprehensible delay”.
  • To break this delay, we must adopt spiral historiography, reading ancient ideas with modern inclusivity to overcome the illusion of acting from a perspective free of contingent historical perspective. As Nietzsche claimed, “Nothing that has a history can be defined”, requiring continuous reflection rather than reliance on fixed ideological systems.

 

 

  1. The Path to Peace: Epimethean Afterthought and Confidence

The essence of the Hanukkah dedication—moving past conflict into forgiveness—is realized by adopting a constructive philosophical disposition toward uncertainty and change.

Peace is not a static given, but a constantly re-established state achieved through continuous, conscious effort and reliance on processes of Epimethean afterthought (epimêtheia). The goal is comprehension, defined as always seeking the whole of the matter and filtering out fallacies.

  1. Embracing Contingency: This philosophy acknowledges that events do not follow a predetermined process, and that “luck” represents the gap between agency and determination. Accepting that conflict resolution is primarily a social and personal need, rather than a purely logical requirement, frees us from the futile attempt to attain absolute, transcendent standards.
  2. Fostering Practical Confidence: The intellectual journey culminates in practical confidence. Confidence, a social phenomenon, allows the ethical life to flourish from strength, not from the weakness of self-deception and dogmatism. This requires establishing an equilibrium achieved in practice between private and public understanding. The public sphere demands clear, accountable rules, while the private life must retain its density and conviction derived from intuition and unresolved conflict.

By lighting the successive Hanukkah lights, we commit to the reflective ascent toward this self-aware and compassionate existence. This is the humanistic project realized: consciously shaping the organization of time and the fate of humanity through caring (panser) and truthfulness, ensuring that the destructive power of tekhnē and the corrosive force of eris are continually subjected to the disciplines of rational, empathetic, and historically informed thought.

 

 

PEACE.

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
The following two tabs change content below.
Neville Buch (Pronounced Book) Ph.D. is a certified member of the Professional Historians Association (Queensland). Since 2010 he has operated a sole trade business in history consultancy. He was a Q ANZAC 100 Fellow 2014-2015 at the State Library of Queensland. Dr Buch was the PHA (Qld) e-Bulletin, the monthly state association’s electronic publication, and was a member of its Management Committee. He is the Managing Director of the Brisbane Southside History Network.
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x