Buckley’s Up With Liberalism Mind-Twister

February 8, 2025
“Liberalism is the refuge favored by intellectual cowardice, because the essence of the liberal’s position is that he has no position.”       The quote is Buckley’s Up With Liberalism Mind-Twister. It is one of the great political falsehoods of the late twentieth century. William F. Buckley, Jr. (1925-2008) is best known for founding […]

“Liberalism is the refuge favored by intellectual cowardice, because the essence of the liberal’s position is that he has no position.”

 

 

 

The quote is Buckley’s Up With Liberalism Mind-Twister. It is one of the great political falsehoods of the late twentieth century. William F. Buckley, Jr. (1925-2008) is best known for founding the conservative National Review and his public affairs television show, and in 1959 he produced a popular paperback called, “Up From Liberalism”. It was a fusion of reactionary-type traditionalist conservatism and classical liberalism to cut a path for a rightward turn in the Republican Party. Buckley arrogantly stated:

 

 

 

The Liberals I shall refer to in this book are men and women who are clearly associated with the Liberal movement in America, however often they seem to be deviating to right or left from the mainstream. Because Liberalism has no definitive manifesto, one cannot say, prepared to back up the statement with unimpeachable authority, that such-and-such a man or measure is “Liberal.” But one can say that Mrs. Roosevelt is a Liberal, and do so confident that no one will contradict him. . . . [Liberal] men and women and institutions share premises and attitudes, show common reactions, enthusiasms and aversions, and display an empirical solidarity in thought and action, on the strength of which society has come to know them as ‘Liberals.’ They are men and women who tend to believe that the human being is perfectible and social progress predictable, and that the instrument for effecting the two is reason; that truths are transitory and empirically determined; that equality is desirable and attainable through the action of state power; that social and individual differences, if they are not rational, are objectionable, and should be scientifically eliminated; that all peoples and societies should strive or organize themselves upon a rationalist paradigm.

 

 

 

The weed of a lie, a false narrative, based only on the truths of a few foolish personalities who called themselves “liberal”, and not based on any document of “liberalism” as the intellectual paradigm, has brought about the weed flourishing of thought in the Age of Trumpism. It is an utterly false narrative in 2025 and has always been since liberals themselves have harshly critiqued doctrines of human perfectibility. Reading his attack on liberalism, you can see Buckley is merely attempting to make rightism a centralist position on the political spectrum. Again, on the evidence of political doctrines, Buckley’s narrative is false; as is Donald Trump’s bolden lies.

 

 

 

On the positive side, Natasha Mitchell of ABC Radio National pointed out:

 

 

 

Liberalism isn’t just a political philosophy but the basis of a truly meaningful life. That’s the bold statement of philosopher Alexandre Lefebvre, author of the forthcoming book Liberalism As A Way of Life.

 

 

 

There is hope for a new way of learning.

 

 

 

Bibliography

 

Behrent, Michael (2009). Liberalism without Humanism: Michel Foucault and the Free-Market Creed 1976-1979, Modern Intellectual History 6.

 

 

Berlin, Isaiah  (with Bernard Williams) ‘Pluralism and Liberalism: A Reply’ (to George Crowder, ‘Pluralism and Liberalism’, Political Studies 42 (1994), 293–303), Political Studies 42 (1994), 306–9

 

 

Bogus, C. T. (2016). Fighting Over The Conservative Banner. Nomos, 56, 336–374. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26387887

 

 

Buccola, Nicholas (2019). The Fire is Upon Us: James Baldwin, William F. Buckley Jr., and the Debate over Race in America, Princeton University Press.

 

 

Buch, Neville (2024). Buckley’s Chance, Cultural Thinking of Trumpism, and History, Dr Neville Buch ABN: 86703686642, February 2, 2024, https://drnevillebuch.com/buckleys-chance-cultural-thinking-of-trumpism-and-history/

 

 

Buchanan, A. (2004). Political Liberalism and Social Epistemology, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32(2), 95-130. Retrieved October 1, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3557947

 

 

Buckley Jr., William F. (1951). God and Man at Yale: The Superstitions of “Academic Freedom”, Washington, D.C: Regnery Publishing.

 

 

Buckley, William F. (1959, 2016). Up From Liberalism, Martino Fine Books.

 

 

Delton, J. (2009). Conserving Liberalism. Salmagundi, 162/163, 3–24. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40550037

 

 

 

Denniss, Richard (2018). Dead right: how neoliberalism ate itself and what comes next, Black Inc, Carlton, VIC.

 

 

Gross, N., Medvetz, T., & Russell, R. (2011). The Contemporary American Conservative Movement. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 325–354. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41288611

 

 

Heilbrunn, J. (2015). The Republican Civil War. The National Interest, 140, 5–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44028502

 

 

Hijiya, J. A. (2003). The Conservative 1960s. Journal of American Studies, 37(2), 201–227. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27557328

 

 

Holford, John. “The Misuses of Sustainability: Adult Education, Citizenship and the Dead Hand of Neoliberalism.” International Review of Education, vol. 62, no. 5, 2016, pp. 541–561.

 

 

Kurth, J. R. (2016). A History of Inherent Contradictions: The Origins And End Of American Conservatism. Nomos, 56, 13–54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26387879

 

 

Lee, M. J. (2017). Considering Political Identity: Conservatives, Republicans, and Donald Trump. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 20(4), 719–730. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.20.4.0719

 

 

Mitchell, Natasha (2025). Liberalism as the basis of life? ABC Radio National, Thurday 2 Jan 2025 at 4:00pm, https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/bigideas/liberalism-meaningful-life/104462892

 

 

Rosenblatt, Helena (2018). The Lost History of Liberalism: from ancient Rome to the twenty-first century, Princeton University Press, Princeton ; Oxford

 

 

Rosenzvaig, Eduardo and Ronaldo Munck (1997). Neoliberalism: Economic Philosophy of Postmodern Destruction, Latin American Perspectives 24

 

 

Seethi, Kalim (2001). Postmodernism, Neoliberalism and Civil Society: A Critique of the Development Strategies in the Era of Globalisation, The Indian Journal of Political Science, 62(3), 307-320. Retrieved September 4, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42771344

 

 

Siedentop, Larry  (2014). Inventing the Individual: The Origins of Western Liberalism, Penguin

 

 

Weaver, Richard (2017). Up From Liberalism, The Imaginative Conservative, November 13th, 2017.

 

 

 

 

Featured Image: Wood Letters, Open Your Mind, on blue background. ID 183586659 © Zvonkov Eugene | Dreamstime.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
The following two tabs change content below.
Neville Buch (Pronounced Book) Ph.D. is a certified member of the Professional Historians Association (Queensland). Since 2010 he has operated a sole trade business in history consultancy. He was a Q ANZAC 100 Fellow 2014-2015 at the State Library of Queensland. Dr Buch was the PHA (Qld) e-Bulletin, the monthly state association’s electronic publication, and was a member of its Management Committee. He is the Managing Director of the Brisbane Southside History Network.
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments