Dr Neville Buch
Abstract
In the contemporary intellectual landscape, Gary Jaron’s (2021/2022) definition of Religious Studies as the study of the sacred and our response to what we consider sacred serves as a vital catalyst for moving the field beyond the limited recognition of supernatural entities toward a study of human action. Dr. Neville Buch evaluates this shift through the lens of Spiral Historiography and the ”topological turn,” arguing that while Jaron correctly identifies the sacred as a continuum of human values, this meaning must be anchored ”in rebus” (in the thing itself) within specific historical and physical landscapes. This essay explores Buch’s take on Jaron, utilizing the Dynamic of Cognition (DoC) framework to contrast “potted thinking” and “historical forgetfulness” with a humanistic ascent toward Human Authorship and Planetary Wisdom.
Featured Image: Conceptual-Systems-for-Studies-in-Religion

Neville Buch
Latest posts by Neville Buch (see all)
- Part 3:The Failure of an Educational Institution and How to Spiral Forward – October 10, 2026
- Part 2:The Failure of an Educational Institution and How to Spiral Forward – October 10, 2026
- Part 1:The Failure of an Educational Institution and How to Spiral Forward – October 10, 2026
