Dr Neville Buch

Professional Historian and History Consultancy Services Brisbane

Category: Important Public Statement

  • Management Institute for Contributory Economy: Mapping Brisbane for the World

    Management Institute for Contributory Economy: Mapping Brisbane for the World

      5 December 2025 PDF File (Attachment) Mapping Brisbane for the World   Dr Neville Buch (ABN 86703686642) Scholar, Principal Researcher, Team Leader, Management Institute for Contributory Economy Business Office 18 Callendar Street, Sunnybank Hills 4109 AUSTRALIA     cc. Drs. Michael Mackin and Neil Peach, Directors, Management Institute for Contributory Economy      …

    Read more…

  • Why moralism does not work.

    Why moralism does not work.

          WHY MORALISM DOES NOT WORK Please Understand, for the sake of kindness.     From Thomas Banchoff, Liberals and conservatives shy away from this core Catholic teaching, Cruelty is ravaging politics. What happened to mercy? The Washington Post.     November 13, 2025     “Liberals and conservatives shy away from mercy…

    Read more…

  • Changing the Minds of University Marketers

    Changing the Minds of University Marketers

    A Post at UQ Change Makers:     Early this morning I had a conversation with an old undergraduate graduate on his need to retire the nostalgia and to think about the past and present with more intelligence (double meaning).       It got me thinking about the historical ideas which have been swirling…

    Read more…

  • Where it started locally (Queensland): Ottoline Leyser, ‘We are destroying the diversity in our university system’

    Where it started locally (Queensland): Ottoline Leyser, ‘We are destroying the diversity in our university system’

    Jack Grove, Ottoline Leyser: ‘We are destroying the diversity in our university system’, Times Higher Education Supplement (THE), June 26, 2025.     Comment: The THE article is in the UK natural science context, but where it began locally, for Australian humanities research, was when The University of Queensland got rid of boutique courses in…

    Read more…

  • TASA Statement on the Targeting of the Social Sciences and Humanities

    TASA Statement on the Targeting of the Social Sciences and Humanities

    Please read the TASA Statement on the Targeting of the Social Sciences and Humanities, 20 June 2025. It very much matters.     TASA STATEMENT      

    Read more…

  • Neville, help revive the contest of ideas

    Neville, help revive the contest of ideas

          Dr Neville Buch (ABN 86703686642) Business Office An Australian Top Humanities and Social Science Researcher 18 Callendar Street, Sunnybank Hills 4109 AUSTRALIA       Hon. John Howard Former Australian Prime Minister c/ Menzies Research Centre PO Box 6091 Kingston ACT 2604 AUSTRALIA       12 June 2025      …

    Read more…

  • An example of basic prejudice in both machine and humans

    An example of basic prejudice in both machine and humans

    What I said to the machine:     Is it a holiday today anywhere in the United States? Of course, you understand, machine, that today is AEST? No, I was asking about May 27 AEST, which is not Monday in the United States. You cannot make the time cognition conversions. Machines are stupid.    …

    Read more…

  • Thinking on Attitudes Among those Who Think About Unity and Universality

    Thinking on Attitudes Among those Who Think About Unity and Universality

    “Attitudes: Socio-Historical Change in Unitarian Universalism,” Dr. Neville Buch”     Today, I am looking at attitudes in Unitarian-Universalism, and they are not always good, but in critical thinking each person can renew, for themselves, better unitarian universalism thinking.   Each of us has a free mind but we are not free in our thinking…

    Read more…

  • Compatibility: Consistent Intellectual Thought (academia.edu paper)

    Compatibility: Consistent Intellectual Thought (academia.edu paper)

    Consistent Intellectual Thought     As consistent intellectual thought, principles are only made compatible contextually. In a moment of time, one principle prioritises over another, but this does not deny the other principle. The other principle is still held, but is merely held over to the next moment of time when it is called upon.…

    Read more…

  • The Irretractable Argument

    The Irretractable Argument

      AI Overview: “Irretractable” means something that cannot be taken back, reversed, or retracted. It’s the opposite of “retractable”. Essentially, if something is irretractable, it’s final and cannot be undone.       In an email group discussion, on the barriers which has prevent me gaining paid work since the end of 2017, Professor Lisa…

    Read more…