The Spiral Historiography in the Techné Mindset

I hope that persons have not “pop” out of the online room, never to return; but I understand such reasons as ill health and the priority of other projects. That is my “innovating” thinking.

The reason to hound you this morning is Tom Fishburne’s explanation of the term “disruptive innovation” and the theory for this lifecycle of innovation.

It is further theoretical evidence for the spiral historiography applied to the problem of the techné mindset. What is so frustrating about the “stupidity” is what makes it stupid. In historical memory, such a way of thinking is stupid simply because in consciousness, it is common sense. Greed pushes us into the stupid commercial way of thinking and most human beings, those with open minds, know this and the damage it causes to society and the individual: impoverishment through unsatisfactory product design for the purpose of overpricing the customer in unnecessary “innovation” steps.

Featured Image:

The following two tabs change content below.

• Bio
• Latest Posts

Neville Buch

Professional Historian at Professional Historians Association (Queensland) Inc.

Neville Buch (Pronounced Book) Ph.D. is a certified member of the Professional Historians Association (Queensland). Since 2010 he has operated a sole trade business in history consultancy. He was a Q ANZAC 100 Fellow 2014-2015 at the State Library of Queensland. Dr Buch was the PHA (Qld) e-Bulletin, the monthly state association’s electronic publication, and was a member of its Management Committee. He is the Managing Director of the Brisbane Southside History Network.

Latest posts by Neville Buch (see all)

• The Spiral Historiography in the Techné Mindset – October 13, 2026
• The Personalist Approach to Argument: Dialectic, Relationality, and the Spiral of Human Authorship – October 12, 2026
• From Augustine’s Pears to Academic Boycotts: Fundamental Sociological Change in Australian Cultural Relations – October 11, 2026