Dr Neville Buch

Professional Historian and History Consultancy Services Brisbane

Category: Important Public Statement

  • As I Stand Mildly Crucified: Life of Jesus

    As I Stand Mildly Crucified: Life of Jesus

        As I Stand Mildly Crucified: Life of Jesus     Abstract This essay presents a philosophical plea constructed through the “historical-critical” lens of David Strauss’ Life of Jesus, advocating for the professional employment of Dr. Neville Buch. It argues that just as Strauss sought to strip away the “mythical” layers of the New…

    Read more…

  • The Outsider’s Synthesis. Jack McKinney and the Cost of Ignorance

    The Outsider’s Synthesis. Jack McKinney and the Cost of Ignorance

        The Outsider’s Synthesis. Jack McKinney and the Cost of Ignorance A report on Jack McKinney and the Cost of Ignorance. Jack Philip McKinney’s philosophy was markedly different from that of his contemporaries, and his case offers profound lessons regarding why Australian society continues to ignore its independent thinkers. The following analysis details these…

    Read more…

  • The City of Intellect: Urban Sociology and Suburban Action

    The City of Intellect: Urban Sociology and Suburban Action

      PDF File: The City of Intellect. Urban Sociology and Suburban Action     The City of Intellect: Urban Sociology and Suburban Action Abstract The Southern Brisbane Suburban Forum (SBSF) provides a revolutionary framework for Brisbane residents to engage with their environment, moving beyond the reductive logic of “rates, roads, and rubbish”. Drawing on the…

    Read more…

  • From Offence to Understanding Essay Series: Essays 1-3

    From Offence to Understanding Essay Series: Essays 1-3

      Politeness and Offence: 1 of 3 in “From Offence to Understanding Essay Series” From Offence to Understanding Essay Series: There are moments of time when politeness is not a virtue because it is not just. Offence was necessarily committed to challenge unhealthy thinking. It was the virtue of candour. Fools deflect from this argument…

    Read more…

  • Why the Disciplines and No Apologetics Part 4. Back to genuine faith and reason

    Why the Disciplines and No Apologetics Part 4. Back to genuine faith and reason

    For years I been hounding in ‘the public square’ about the failure of the apologetics industry which needs to be scrapped. And by apologetics industry I mean unreformed organisational humanism as much as I mean unreformed evangelicalism for the 21st century. It is time to act.     I have a message that must be…

    Read more…

  • The Messaging of the Past Thinkers: In Relation to Dr Buch’s Work

    The Messaging of the Past Thinkers: In Relation to Dr Buch’s Work

      This essay synthesizes the “messages” of the seminal thinkers identified in the Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thinkers (prior to 1983) and integrates their insights with the subsequent philosophical work of Dr. Neville Buch and his 21st-century contemporaries.   https://www.academia.edu/150270892/The_Messaging_of_the_Past_Thinkers_In_Relation_to_Dr_Buchs_Work    Attached: The Messaging of the Past Thinkers. In Relation to Dr Buch’s Work  …

    Read more…

  • How to bring social change for the better

    How to bring social change for the better

        PDF File: How to bring social change for the better     Abstract The intersection of Joshua Kyle T. Rovero’s “Metaphysics of Revolution” and the work of Dr. Neville Buch constitutes a 21st-century “new thinking” that redefines the mechanism of change in human society. Rovero redefines revolution not as a mere political event…

    Read more…

  • Three “Women” Philosophers

    Three “Women” Philosophers

      Hannah Arendt (1906-1975) Abstract The intersection of the philosophies of Hannah Arendt and Dr. Neville Buch provides a powerful intellectual defence of human authorship and plurality in an era increasingly defined by the “technical abyss” and the erosion of truth. Arendt’s “how” of philosophy—rooted in passionate thinking, the vita activa, and a non-determinative theory…

    Read more…

  • Defending Philosophical Compatibility Against Neo-Conservative Thought

    Defending Philosophical Compatibility Against Neo-Conservative Thought

    PDF File: Defending Philosophical Compatibility Against Neo-Conservative Thought     Abstract The philosophy of “philosophical compatibility” emerges in the 21st century as a robust defence of human authorship against the reductionist and exclusionary critiques of “NeoConservatism”. While Neoconservatism often relies on the “Principle Basic Fallacy”—the artificial separation of the natural from the technical—to enforce rigid,…

    Read more…

  • 21st Century Revolution in Thinking

    21st Century Revolution in Thinking

    https://www.academia.edu/146206774/21st_Century_Revolution_in_Thinking     PDF File: 21st Century Revolution in Thinking     Abstract The transition into the second quarter of the 21st century is marked by a profound intellectual shift—a “new thinking” that seeks to reclaim human agency from the “technical abyss” and the “immense regression” of the post-truth era. This paradigm, increasingly defined as…

    Read more…